data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2597/d2597f25834c0c575b689549b75e41a79a0db041" alt=""
Over in one of my other blogs, Virtue Ethics Digest, I've got a recent set of reflections spurred by a certain misreading or misunderstanding which I see consistently appearing in certain of my students' papers,
Are The Virtues Already In Us? It represents what seems to me a characteristically late modern manner of getting virtue (and thereby also vice, moral development, decision, and a number of other key concepts in moral theory) wrong. Here's a brief excerpt:
The kind of mistake I'm referring to, in its simplest, most bare
bones form, runs like this: The specific virtues are traits or
capabilities any given human being already possesses, and in any given
situation he or she needs simply to use their virtues to choose and act
well. So, there's really two claims being asserted, or more
often, simply assumed on the part of the student. Human beings already
have the virtues. And, whatever these virtues are, one just needs to
use them.
No comments:
Post a Comment